The Possible Villains of Star Wars Episode VII

Scott Chitwood over at www.comingsoon.net has posted an excellent look at the possible villains available for the next Star Wars film(s).  Of the options, I think a combination of the remnants of the Empire (lead by Grand Admiral Thrawn?) and a resurrected Sith Order to mirror the Jedi Order being recreated by Luke is the best option.  Star Wars loves duality.  I think the contrast of the two orders being rebuilt would make a great base for the next batch of stories.  What would you like to see?  Do any of these stand out to you as the way Abrams and company should go?

The Villains of Episode VII

While it’s pretty clear who the heroes of the new “Star Wars” films will be, the antagonists are a bit less clear. Who will create the wars in “Star Wars”? There are an awful lot of options, and almost all of them have already been explored in the Expanded Universe. Which ones worked, which ones didn’t, and which ones are the best options? Read on…

The Cloned Emperor

Way back in 1991, the comic “Dark Empire” from Dark Horse featured an intriguing villain – a cloned Emperor Palpatine. The premise was that in “Return of the Jedi” when the Emperor was killed by Darth Vader, his Sith powers transferred his spirit into the body of a clone of himself in a vault on another planet. Palpatine then came back and started trying to reclaim control of the galaxy. (That was pretty cool, but then the story also featured Luke Skywalker becoming resurrected Palpatine’s apprentice in order to find a way to defeat him. That didn’t make a lot of sense.)

Why This Would Be A Good Idea
Cloning is a big theme in “Star Wars,” so resurrecting the Emperor using the technology is a fun idea. On top of that, it expands on the ‘unnatural’ powers of Palpatine which he alluded to in “Revenge of the Sith.” It might also open up the possibility that Anakin Skywalker wasn’t the product of a midi-clorian birth as described in “The Phantom Menace,” but a product of freaky-deaky Sith experimentation by Palpatine. Also, bringing in a new actor to play young Ian McDiarmid could be fun and it ties the previous two trilogies together. This is, essentially, resurrecting Hitler for World War III.

Why This Would Be A Bad Idea
Making the villain the cloned Emperor would be a lot like making a second Death Star in “Return of the Jedi.” It has all been done before….why do it again? Break new ground. Don’t retread old territory. And bringing back the Emperor would seem to take away from Darth Vader’s sacrifice at the end of Episode VI.

Invaders from a Neighboring Galaxy

With the book series “The New Jedi Order,” the Star Wars Universe was invaded by an external threat – the Yuuzhan Vong. These invaders took over the galaxy planet by planet, eventually going as far as Coruscant. The villains even managed to kill Chewbacca as well as Han and Leia’s youngest son Anakin Solo. These aliens had all of their technology based on organics and were also not visible in the Force, thus befuddling the new Jedi in the series. This unstoppable threat forced the Republic and what was left of the Empire to join forces before finally saving the day.

Why This Would Be A Good Idea
Bringing in any new threat from outside of the Star Wars galaxy, whether it is the Yuuzhan Vong or not, is a good idea because it is essentially a blank slate. The ships, aliens, and technology can be whatever you want them to be, and it’s not simply Jedi battling Sith again. It allows for fresh ideas to come into play. It also forces the Republic and Empire to work together, and the theme of reconciliation is a good one for a new trilogy. Having kids see enemies putting aside their differences for the greater good is a better theme than seeing their hero choke his pregnant wife to death.

Why This Would Be A Bad Idea
Having a blank slate for the villains can go off the rails pretty quickly. The Yuuzhan Vong had organic technology which was a good idea, but it didn’t take long for it to feel like it was not part of the Star Wars movie universe. It felt more like H.R. Giger and “Alien” than Ralph McQuarrie and “A New Hope.” The Yuuzhan Vong were also religious zealots and their cult of pain worship grew tedious over time. Finally, as far as villains, go they were dark. Very dark. They didn’t match the tone of the films well, and that’s a risk you take with any external invader.

Remnants of the Empire

In the book “Heir to the Empire” by Timothy Zahn, a group of Imperials returned from an expedition into the Unknown Region of the galaxy to find the Empire collapsed, the Jedi returned, and the Rebels now in control. Naturally, that didn’t sit too well with them. And fortunately for them, they were led by Grand Admiral Thrawn. A brilliant strategist sidelined by the Empire’s anti-alien policies, Thrawn leads the Imperials in victory after victory and begins to break the Alliance’s fragile control of the galaxy.

Why This Would Be A Good Idea
There’s nothing quite as satisfying as seeing X-Wings battle TIE Fighters, AT-AT’s on the battlefield, and Star Destroyers blasting away at the Alliance fleet. So there is some appeal to seeing what’s left of the Empire backed into a corner and fighting to the last man.

Why This Would Be A Bad Idea
While Grand Admiral Thrawn was a great tactician who led the Imperials to numerous victories, he’s a limited threat to the Jedi one on one. Alone against Luke Skywalker and a lightsaber, any Imperial is outmatched. You need a threat that can take on a Jedi head to head (as Zahn addressed by bring an insane cloned Jedi into the mix to battle Luke). So if you’re going to bring Imperials into the mix, you have to bring a lot more in along with them.

New Sith

If the galaxy can be repopulated with new Jedi, it can be repopulated with new Sith as well, right? Since “Return of the Jedi,” there haven’t been many full blooded Sith. In the book series “Legacy of the Force,” Han Solo and Leia’s son Jacen turned to the Dark Side and became Darth Caedus. Later in the comic series “Legacy” from Dark Horse, Luke Skywalker’s descendant Cade Skywalker does battle with a host of red and black tattooed Sith including the female Darth Talon. But for further examples of Sith warriors, you can look back to the Old Republic for all sorts of varieties of Sith.

Why This Would Be A Good Idea
Sith and Jedi are like chocolate and peanut butter. They go great together. And since the whole Star Wars Saga is about the Light Side vs. the Dark Side, it makes sense that the Sith appear and represent the other side of the coin when it comes to the Force. Plus the Sith are one of the few legitimate threats the Jedi can face head on. You could also bring in some new characters to spice things up. A love interest for the kids of Leia and Han that is secretly evil? A character that is secretly the offspring of Palpatine? There are a bunch of possibilities.

Why This Would Be A Bad Idea
Practically every Sith that has been created since the films has been a weaker copy of Darth Maul or Darth Vader. They’re all either tattooed like Maul, a cyborg, or they have a strange armor. Few of the creators have really brought much new to the table when it comes to the Sith. And most of the Sith rant about the Dark Side in a repetitive way that becomes tedious. Neither their designs nor their motivations are that intriguing and a movie would have to really step things up to create something engaging. Even Darth Maul was simply a cool action character with little depth. Audiences will want something more. And I have to say that turning Han and Leia’s son to the Dark Side was pretty depressing, not to mention repetitive consider who his grandfather was. I hope the films don’t go in this direction.

There are, of course, other threats in the galaxy such as crime organizations (like in “Shadows of the Empire”), bounty hunters, Dark Jedi (who are not full fledged Sith), droids, and politicians, but they aren’t good antagonists on their own. They need to be part of a larger threat as mentioned above. (But please, let’s not have more Senate debates and trade discussions in a sequel.) Overall, J.J. Abrams and Michael Arndt have a lot of great possibilities in front of them, but they have just as many pitfalls to avoid as the Expanded Universe shows.

Top 5: Bryan Singer Movies

Top 5: TV Episodes of All-Time (Comedy Edition)

Today heralds the return of director Bryan Singer to the cinema with Jack and the Giant.  While it doesn’t seem like this is going to be a classic on par with his earlier work (Rotten Tomatoes has it at 49% at the time of this piece), I’m just glad he’s back.  His career got off to such a spectacular beginning and, let’s not forget, we owe this man for beginning the modern comic book movie renaissance with the first two X-Men films.  Singer got his start in Hollywood as an assistant to Richard Donner whose Superman saga he brought to a close in Superman Returns.  I think the stress of that production and the backlash from some fans really shook him and threw him entirely off track.  I love Superman Returns.  I’ll have to do a whole column on it sometime, but I think it’s absolutely fantastic.  So here are my top 5 Singer films and I cannot wait to see what he has in store for us next year with X-Men: Days of Future Past.
1. The Usual Suspects (1993)
2. Superman Returns (2006)
3. X2: X-Men United (2003)
4. X-Men (2000)
5. Valkyrie (2008)

Bryan-Singer-X-Men-director-jpg

Shine On Award Nomination

Erratic Mess was kind enough to nominate Killing Time for the Shine On Blogger Award.  I’m extremely grateful for the kindness and I encourage anyone who stumbles upon my site to check out her’s.  She has an awesome page and I’m honored that she thought of me.

http://erraticmess.wordpress.com

shineon1

The Shine On Award Rules:

  •  Link back to the blogger who nominated you.
  •  Post the badge on your blog.
  •  Answer the questions posed to you.
  •  Nominate five bloggers who shine a little light in your day and be sure to notify them.
  •  Issue some questions you’d like them to answer

My Answers:

01. If you could go anywhere, where would you go?

I’ve always wanted to see London.  I’d love to go back in time and do college again.  But, where I’d really want to go, where I’d love to live out my days, is in Tolkien’s Middle Earth.  Hey, you didn’t specify temporal or fictional restrictions.  I’m an outside-the-box thinker.

02. How have the books you have read influenced your own writing?

It’s a cliché that’s true: if you want to be a better writer, be a better reader.  Books are a wonderful thing.  They furnish the soul.  John Kieran put it well when he said, “I am a part of all that I have read.”  Every good thing I read challenges me to be a better writer.  I don’t think emulation is of any use.  The best writing is a true extension of the author.  Write how you’d speak if you had the same command and recall that print affords and oral communication lacks.  That’s the “voice” that gets dissected in English classes ad nauseam. 

03. Where do you receive most of your inspiration?

I find that I’m an infinitely better writer after just having watched or read something that buzzed my brain.  I get a contact endorphin high of sorts off of exposure to brilliant work.  For example, I worship Aaron Sorkin’s teleplays and screenplays, so if I just watched a rerun of The West Wing or A Few Good Men, I find I have all these thoughts bouncing around my brain because what I’ve been concentrating on has raised and honed my thinking to a place where I want to express myself.  Sorkin is my mind Gatorade.

04. What is your favorite season?

Autumn.  Fall is a rather bleak word, whereas ‘autumn’ is elegant.  I lived for six years in Southern California and one of the things I missed the most was the gradual change from summer to autumn; the leaves changing, the temperature leveling out at just right; the holidays and all the comes with them.  Autumn is the best of all times.

05. Why do you blog?

I write because I have to write.  If I go a day without writing, I feel like something’s gone terribly awry.  It’s that itchy feeling in your head that you left something on, forgot to turn in an assignment or feed your fish.  That’s how writing is with me.  It’s a spigot I plop into my forehead so I can vent some of the oddness that builds up within.

My Questions:

01. What book (or film) has had the most influence on your writing?
02. What was the last movie you watched or book you read that moved you to
        tears?  Manly stoic mistiness does indeed count.
03. What event/motivation moved you to start your blog?
04. What is your favorite place on Earth (note: if you have visited other planets,
         screw the first question and tell us about that)?
05. Superman vs. Batman: who wins?  There IS a right answer.

My Nominations:

New Iron Man 3 Poster and Trailer Next Week

 

ironman3posterwatermark

On the heels of the Mandarin one-sheet, comes a new official poster for Iron Man 3 showing more multi-suit Iron Manny goodness.  Look for a new trailer for the first film of the Marvel Cinematic Universe’s second phase to drop next week.

Movie Review: Seven Psychopaths (2012)

"I like it.  It's got layers."
“I like it. It’s got layers.”

Martin McDonagh is a weird dude.  For those of you who haven’t seen In Bruges, his first feature, it’s very difficult for me to describe…really anything he does.  Here’s the simple review: if you liked In Bruges, you’ll like Seven Psychopaths.  If you hated In Bruges, you’ll loathe Seven Psychopaths.  McDonagh has clearly established an idiom all his own and is, if nothing else, a completely unique filmmaker in a derivative age.

I utterly loved this movie.  Loved it and the rating I’m giving it is reflective of my taste.  However, I would be perfectly respectful of someone who watched it and thought it was the biggest load of nonsense they’d ever seen.  This isn’t Citizen Kane.  It’s a preference movie.  If your sense of humor can run black as pitch and you don’t mind it being profane and exceedingly violent (hilariously so on occasion), this is your movie.  A sense of humor is a very tough thing to recommend or legislate with a review.  I am of the opinion that things are funny to a person or not and it’s not so much the material as how much you connect with it or it’s commentary on the world.  That’s going to be subjective and is why it’s a lot harder to review or recommend comedies than dramas.  A sense of humor is a personal thing.  Personally, I think McDonagh is a profoundly disturbed, hilarious writer and a talented director.

Seven Psychopaths is presumptively about two psychopaths (Sam Rockwell and Christopher Walken) who make their living kidnapping dogs from wealthy people and then returning them for the reward.  This goes awry when they kidnap the dog of a mob boss (Woody Harrelson) who happens to be psychopathic himself.  Colin Farrell plays their friend sucked into their madness and as things go, the film gets increasingly meta and complex so much so to the point that there was a fantastic reveal involving a cravat (best use of cravats in cinematic history) and I blurted out loud, “That is awesome! ….wait…what?” 

McDonagh’s ultimate talent is that in the midst of his madness and chaos he can create characters you come to care very deeply about (very flawed though they may be) and then grounding the film in that connection so it’s a wonderful mix of mad humor and character-driven plot.  If this makes no sense, I completely understand and will refer you to my simpler review above.  I had a blast with this film and I can’t wait to watch it again.
9.0/10

Movie Reviews, Trailers, Polls, Lists, and More!!!

%d bloggers like this: