Movie Review: The Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug Extended Edition *MAJOR SPOILERS*

The_Hobbit_The_Desolation_of_Smaug_-_Bringing_Smaug_to_Life
Next week, we’ll return for the final time to Middle-earth with Peter Jackson.  The final installment of The Hobbit Trilogy: The Battle of the Five Armies will connect it to The Lord of the Rings and give us a 20 hour Middle-earth epic that we’ll be able to revisit for years to come.  I am not sure why, at this point, the studio bothers Jackson about running time.  These are long films.  But in every case, the extended editions, released a year after the theatrical cut, have improved the film, sometimes dramatically so.

Last year I reviewed the extended edition of An Unexpected Journey before we traveled to the theaters to experience The Desolation of Smaug, and if you want to revisit either of those just click on the title to be taken to the review.  As I did in my review of An Unexpected Journey, I’m not going to retread old ground, I’m going to focus on what was changed and how it affected the overall film.

The Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug, Thorin Oakenshield, Richard Armitage, Martin Freeman, Bilbo Baggins
The Desolation of Smaug was, of the five films released thus far, the one I had the most problems with the theatrical cut.  I eagerly awaited the 25 minutes longer extended edition and hoped that it would improve the film.  The short answer is that, yes, like all the other EE’s, The Desolation of Smaug Extended Edition is the definitive version of the film.  I’m very pleased with the additions in every case, but it can’t raise the film out of the bottom spot.  Of course, when we’re talking about splitting hairs in the 9.0 – 10.0 range, even the bottom film is still great fun.

The Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug, Peter Jackson

Peter Jackson is a master at adding back in just single shots here and there, most of which go unnoticed by those viewing the film, but the overall experience is always smoother and the theatrical cut of DOS was a very choppy movie.  Now, having seen what they cut out, I’m baffled as to why they did.  There are two storylines that the 25 minutes is mostly devoted to expanding and they are critical, especially leading up to The Battle of the Five Armies and connecting this film to the Middle-earth epic Jackson’s turned these films in to.

beorn-header
Beorn and Thrain.  That’s where the majority of the scenes (or portions of scenes) focus on: the last of the skinchangers and the father of Thorin.  These are not unimportant, extra material; this was critical material that should have never been removed from the film.  Let’s talk about Beorn first.

-bfe98d11-b43b-4945-93e8-c0c7a61538e9

In the theatrical cut, Beorn is treated almost like a checked box.  In  reading The Hobbit, Beorn is one of the coolest parts of the book and he never reappears in Lord of the Rings, so this is the only chance we get to see him.  The theatrical cut made him seem trivial; like a hoop to be jumped through on our way to Mirkwood.  The scenes added give Beorn much more due, make him a much bigger deal and stamp him as a significant character in the story.  He’s someone even Gandalf is wary of and in his consultations with the wizard, he ties himself to the Dol Guldur and Necromancer storyline.

hobbit_smaug_3

That storyline, from Gandalf’s visiting the tomb of the Nazgul to the puzzling confrontation that left him in a cage at film’s end made me a little nuts.  The Necromancer, Dol Guldur and the realization that Sauron has returned is some of the meatiest stuff being pulled from the appendices and it was incredibly short shrifted in the film in favor of dwarf/elf romance and an elaborate change to the showdown with Smaug that I still don’t think was necessary.

bande-annonce-de-_the-hobbit-la-dc3a9solation-de-smaug_-version-longue-mp4_000020240

What was principally cut from the opening scene in The Prancing Pony with Thorin and Gandalf to the wizard’s climactic battle with the Necromancer is the complete elimination of Thrain.  The madness that runs through Thorin’s family and the ultimate fate of Thrain was something that has completely been dealt with the EE of both the first and second films and I’m wondering how much damage that will do to what happens to Thorin in Battle of the Five Armies.

maxresdefault (10)

When Gandalf goes to Dol Guldur, he’s attacked by a crazed, disheveled Thrain, who has been kept prisoner there all these years and we find out that the Necromancer took the last of the dwarven rings from him.  We also find out that from his discussion with Gandalf once the wizard heals his mind (and also in an added bit to the confrontation between Smaug and Bilbo) that Sauron and Smaug are already in league.  What Gandalf laid forth as a nightmare scenario to The White Council is already a reality.

Worst-Does-all-of-this-prequel-Sauron-stuff-line-up-with-LOTR

Thrain stays with Gandalf until his demise, but by “stay with him” I mean he’s literally right on his heels, so I don’t know how they edited him out.  Removing him from that storyline was why it felt so puzzling and incomplete.  The entry of Sauron’s forces into the Battle of the Five Armies makes much more sense, has more weight and carries with it the extra dread that Sauron and Smaug are in league.

There are few other scenes added here and there.  Mirkwood is slightly expanded.  Lake-Town is given a little more time and serves as Jackson’s introduction to “The World of Men” and the sorry state it’s in given the context Men will play as the rising force throughout the whole of these films.  I still hate The Master and his lackey and think it one of the most uninteresting locales in all Middle-Earth.

The Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug, Lake Town

Nothing is added to the confrontation with the elves, nor very little with anything after Lake-Town, save a few more lines between Bilbo and Smaug.  The entire contrived battle between Smaug and the dwarves inside the mountain still strikes me as off and an unnecessary deviation from the book.

maxresdefault (11)

All that being said, this is a much better film, but still my least favorite of the five thus far.  I think giving Beorn his due and adding Thrain were both absolutely critical moves that shouldn’t have been relegated to an extended cut.  I’m at a point now that when I go see this films, I look at them as half-finished and that I’ll have to wait a year to see what the real movie will look like when I get the real version: the extended edition.  It will be bittersweet to go to see the Five Armies next week.  It’s something I’ve always wanted to see, but it will also mark our last trip to Middle-earth for a very long time.  The rights to the material in The Silmarillion lies with the Tolkien family and they’ve not been fans of the films.  There’s enough there to support six more films or years of a HBO show, but unless Christopher Tolkien passes on and his children feel differently, I don’t think we’ll ever see that.  So raise a pint to the improved Desolation of Smaug and to the hope of a finish of a very good trilogy next week!
ORIGINAL SMAUG SCORE: 9.0
EE SMAUG SCORE: 9.25

3 thoughts on “Movie Review: The Hobbit The Desolation of Smaug Extended Edition *MAJOR SPOILERS*”

  1. I am worried that Into the Woods will be diminished in its translation to the screen, I am worried that Big Eyes will not be a return to form for Tim Burton, and I am worried that BOTFA, the film that must connect the two trilogies, will be the weak link in the chain. And those are the three film I’m most looking forward to this Christmas. Tis the season of ambivalence. I have read that Smaug is taken down right at the beginning of the movie, and while I understand that Jackson’s epic encompasses so much more than a simple retelling of the Hobbit, I am seriously beginning to wonder about the wisdom of turning it into three films. There is something wrong with an entire movie based on the climax of a novel that was short to begin with. Or, at least, I can’t shake the feeling that there might be something wrong. Hopefully in four days I will finish my last-ever trip to Middle Earth amazed and relaxed.

    Like

    1. Well, if you think the climax to The Hobbit is the death of Smaug, you’ll be horribly disappointed because Bard IS going to kill him to kick off what will essentially be a build up and fall out to two battles (Dol Guldur and The Five Armies) that oddly enough are glossed over in the book. The climax of The Hobbit is the closing of the circle of Thorin and Bilbo’s friendship; and the how horribly it goes awry in a few minutes as Bilbo alludes to in the prologue of the first film. Smaug SHOULD have been dealt with last film. Why Tolkien chose to sit out the battle all battles by conking Bilbo on the head and havinghing him wake up to a recap is the most baffling thing in the Middle-earth saga to me. This film has essentially been the first half of the Lord of the Rings, the battle in the North; the second three films depicting the traditional books as the battle in the South. If you think Smaug’s death is the end game of the story, you WILL be disappointed, because it’s not and both Jacksln and del Toro knew tahat. What they should have done was take 20 more minutes an deal with Smaug in Film 2 and begin to build the hype for the battle of all battles..

      Like

      1. I first read the Hobbit when I was 8 or 9. I had never read anything like it before. It was one of those deals where I stayed up and read the entire book in a single night. I looked up and it was six o’ clock AM.

        I should not have been so negative with my comment. Of course I understand what Jackson is trying to do. The Hobbit trilogy is shaping up to be better than the LOTR movies in my mind. It’s just that from time to time I want to see a more literal representation of the beautiful, poetic literary fairy tale I fell in love with at age eight. It’s not so much about story as it is about tone.

        But in a few days Jackson is probably going to give me the best Christmas present I will receive this year, and I don’t even know him, so I will cease complaining and enjoy the movie for what it is. This is a momentous occasion.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s