Tom Hanks, A Hologram for the King

Movie Review: A Hologram for the King (2016) *Hanks At His Most Likable*

A Hologram for the King, Tom Hanks

When I first saw the trailer for A Hologram for the King earlier this year, my first thought was, “What is Tom Hanks doing in this movie?”  It looked utterly forgettable and completely beneath his stature as one of the greatest actors of all-time.  Well, “having fun in a charming movie that has flown completely below most radars,” turns out to be the answer to the question.
Tom Hanks, A Hologram for the King

Adapted from Dave Eggers’ best-selling novel, A Hologram for the King tells the story of Alan Clay (Hanks).  Having failed at business, family (though not in the eyes of his daughter), and staring down the barrel of failing health and a failed life, Clay gets a salesman’s dream: he gets to pitch to a king.  The king, in this case, is that of Saudi Arabia, and Alan is pitching a holographic teleconferencing system.  He needs the deal.  Not just for his own confidence, but to put his daughter back in college and get his life back on track.  That all sounds terribly grim, but Hologram is anything but.  Ably directed by Tom Twyker (who also adapted Eggers’ novel), the film moves along at a brisk, light pace enabling Tom Hanks to be something in a movie that he hasn’t been in a very long time: Tom Hanks.

Tom Hanks, A Hologram for the King

There are actors who essentially play themselves in most of the films that they’re in, undercutting their ability to dive deeper into their acting talent (Denzel, I’m looking at you, buddy, but he’s hardly alone).  Actors with deep charisma often will just play themselves in the part and that’s enough to pick up a paycheck, but it rarely creates lasting performances.  Tom Hanks, at the beginning of his career, probably until Big, was one of those people.  1980’s Tom Hanks got by almost entirely (there are a few exceptions including the completely underrated gem with Jackie Gleason, Nothing in Common) on the fact that he’s funny, charming, all-American, and possibly the most likable person on the planet.  As his career blew up, Hanks became a consummate chameleon.  He disappeared into his characters.  Sully just came out three weeks ago, and in it Hanks looks 20 years older than in Hologram, and gives a powerful performance by being nothing whatsoever like Tom Hanks.  In Hologram, Hanks is clearly having fun with the “fish out of water” element of an American salesman in the KSA.

Tom Hanks, A Hologram for the King

This isn’t going to be a film that’s going to go down amongst Hanks most career-defining roles, but I had a great time watching Tom Hanks’ natural humor, warmth and charm on the screen with very little in the way between his character and his natural self.  It won’t win any awards, but I don’t think Hanks did it for any of the normal reasons.  I think he did it to have fun with a witty script that has some truly touching moments.  Highly recomend this as a rental.  I can almost guarantee it will be a better film than his next (the third Robert Langdon snooze: Inferno).


2 thoughts on “Movie Review: A Hologram for the King (2016) *Hanks At His Most Likable*”

  1. Maybe Ron Howard could put his best foot forward (financially speaking) and create a shared Dan Brown/Grinch-verse. Think of the possibilities: the Grinch and Cindy Lou Who have to run around Whoville, trying to save its most prominent citizens from turning up dead, with kerfligger kerflaggers stuffed down their throats. Cindy and the Grinch are aided only by clues found in the lost chapters of the Book of Who. Max, the dog who’s been trailing along, is the true villain of the piece.

    As for Hologram For the King, I was just having a conversation the other day about how Tom Hanks’s career has taken such a detour from its early days. Obviously no one would have it any other way, but yeah, there was a time when he was who he was, and people loved it.


    1. He really did initially get by on his personality, which a lot of comic actors do, but then he did Big and that started a chain of roles that lead him to where he is today, and it’s nice every once in awhile (in the right role) to see that personality is still there. Really enjoyable. Btw, if you have not seen him with Jackie Gleason in his last film, Nothing in Common (also Eva Marie Saint), that is a forgotten gem from 1985, I believe.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s